...In addition the exhibition took place in context of the the so-called "Formalism Debate" A subject for a post in its own right and not something we want to dwell too long on here, the East German Formalism Debate can be briefly summarised as: After initial acceptance of ex-Bauhaus students and their modernist ilk, in July 1950 the East German authorities denounced formalism as "alienated and hostile" towards the German Volk, and a "weapon of imperialism"3 Or to paraphrase: Western, capitalist, decadent... During the debate to the motion, amongst other similar opinions, the views were expressed that "In terms of architecture, which has an important role to play in our Five Year Plan, we are mainly hindered in our attempts to develop an architecture that express the new social conditions in the German Democratic Republic by the so-called "Bauhaus Style" and the constructivist, functionalist world view of many architects", and that, "the production of earthenware and china is neither artistic not practical and doesn't meet the justified demands that our Volk place in such products"5 In addition to general criticisms, Mart Stam, at the time rector of the Kunsthochschule Berlin-Weissensee and previously rector in Dresden, in which capacity he had personally mentored many of the students as they developed the projects on show in the Leipzig exhibition, was also personally attacked...